THE ESTATE OF JOHN FRANCIS CRISTADORO, THROUGH ITS REPRESENTATIVE, REBECCA JONES, AND JOHN HAROLD CRISTADORO, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND AS THE TUTOR OF HIS MINOR BROTHER, BRANDON MICHAEL CRISTADORO Vs. GOLD KIST, INC. AND JAMES DUANE WEAVER
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THE ESTATE OF JOHN FRANCIS CRISTADORO, THROUGH ITS REPRESENTATIVE, REBECCA JONES, AND JOHN HAROLD CRISTADORO, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND AS THE TUTOR OF HIS MINOR BROTHER, BRANDON MICHAEL CRISTADORO * NO. 2001-CA-0026 * COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* VERSUS GOLD KIST, INC. AND JAMES DUANE WEAVER ON REHEARING MURRAY, J., CONCURS WITH REASONS I concur in the conclusion that the quantum of damages found by the trier of fact was manifestly erroneous and constituted an abuse of discretion. I agree that the amounts of general and special damages awarded by the majority in the original opinion and reaffirmed on rehearing are the highest amounts a reasonable trier of fact could award in this case.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
