STATE OF LOUISIANA Vs. ALLISON HODGE AND ROGER HODGE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2000-KA-0515 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL ALLISON HODGE AND ROGER HODGE * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* GORBATY, J., DISSENTS IN PART. I respectfully dissent in part. Although I agree with the majority opinion as it affirms the conviction of Roger Hodge, I disagree with the reversal of the conviction of Allison Hodge. After reviewing the facts of the case, I believe that under the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781 (1979), the evidence presented was sufficient for a jury to convict Allison Hodge of attempted possession of marijuana. For these reasons, I would affirm the conviction and sentence of both defendants.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
