State Of Louisiana VS Sadat El-Amin
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA 2020 NO. KW 1069 VERSUS SADAT In EL- AMIN Re: DECEIVER Sadat El -Amin, Judicial for applying District Court, 30, of 22nd writs, supervisory Parish 2020 Washington, 09 - No. CRI - 101854. BEFORE: GUIDRY, WRIT S. Ct. DENIED. 1390, Supreme McCLENDON, In 1397, Court AND Ramos 206 LANIER, JJ. Louisiana, _ v. L. Ed. 2d 583 ( 2020), U. S._, , the 140 United States held, " the Sixth Amendment' s unanimity requirement However, applies to state and federal criminal trials equally." the Court declined to retroactively observed specifically to jury on brief issue the question federal Court. of to collateral review in review 1051, is state State 1052 ( the on dissenting La. to is a chance at 1407. to cases the 2737, 206 Court should pending 2019- 01815 ( a before Supreme Ramos proceedings C. J., S. Ct. pending 140 S. Ct. Louisiana right adversarial retroactively whether Gipson, Johnson, have currently court v. apply Court the review their 140 at , U. S. _, rule will from applied The w] hether collateral benefit must Moreover, definitively of "[ parties U. S, Ramos holding review. on the will Vannoy, _ v. See cases where we whether 2020). Edwards. question Ramos, collateral 917 ( declined So. 3d to its whether collateral the case and See Edwards L. Ed. 2d in on that unanimity for a future presentation." The address applies question to to cases a has apply decision 6/ 3/ 20), point on out 296 that she disagreed with the majority' s decision to defer ruling until the United are decision the States constrained does district Supreme to not deny Court preclude court if mandates relief relator warranted courts. JMG PMC WIL COURT OF D APPEAL, PUTY FIRST LCLEPOF FOR THE CIRCUIT COURT COURT at by action). this from the time. reurging decision Therefore, However, the of issue the we our in higher
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
