State Of Louisiana VS Michael Russell
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2020 KW 0497 VERSUS MICHAEL In RUSSELL Re: SEPTEMBER State No. BEFORE: WRIT order a to is within Code 420 provide its P. 663 ( on arts a favorable ordering to the to Brady 1196- 97, 10 L. Ed. 2d of the the and the in state its discover to the Maryland, 215 ( defense with See La. Crim. JMM MRT WRC COURT OF APPEAL, P' EPUTY FOR FIRST LEW OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COURT or forensic the phone 83, own district forensic not it the contains district court' s investigation decides issue, at 83 S. Ct. expected evidence 719( A). of to then be forensic art Edwards, determine 87, would state P. a subsequently U. S. its the to the favorable any Code of the defense may conduct cellphone. a v. conduct Thus, state 373 1963), See case, to has knowledge. State also state which or whether conduct If the information, possession defendant. state v. See the investigation pursuant the instant reversed. forensic a In the cellphone evidence Rather, favorable control ordered phone JJ. custody, 718 & 719. La. 1982). the is with possession, Crim. phone CHUTZ, information. defendant a of Further, ofTangipahoa, The state is under no duty to investigate in AND exculpatory contents provide writs, supervisory Parish GRANTED. examination conduct Court, 1802741. erroneously ruling District THERIOT, So. 2d the for applying 2020 McDONALD, duty to court Judicial obtain La. Louisiana, of 21st 03, 1194, to discovered. investigation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
