State Of Louisiana VS Stanley Lindsey

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

1 1 1; 1 1s1 COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA 2020 NO. KW 0239 VERSUS STANLEY LINDSEY APR 2 8 2010 In Re: Stanley Lindsey, Judicial for applying District Court, supervisory Parish of East 19th writs, Baton Rouge, No. 3050854. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, WRIT the DENIED. district that an C. J., AND BURRIS,' JJ. Relator' s application was not timely filed in and relator fails to carry his burden to show court, exception GUIDRY applies. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 930. 8( A). If an application for postconviction relief is untimely, it not 2006- 0169 be considered 9/ 15/ 06), La. on 937 the merits. So. 2d 844 ( See per State v. LeBlanc, Furthermore, curiam). has not advanced a convincing claim of actual innocence. v. 201.3- 0873 ( Pierre, Conway, 2001- 2808 ( La. 4/ La. 10/ 15/ 13), 12/ 02), 816 125 So. 2d So. 3d 290. is not entitled to DNA testing in this case. P. art. 926. 1( B)( 1). Code Crim. P. relator See Finally, See La. State State v. relator Code Crim. Accordingly, the district court did not application for postconviction relief. by denying relator' s La. 403; should err See art. 928. VGW JMG WJB COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT Ut' Lp4t DEPUTY FOR 1 Judge of the CLERK THE William Louisiana J. OF COURT COURT Burris, Supreme retired, Court. serving pro tempore by special appointment

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.