Washington-St. Tammany Electric Cooperative, Inc. and Claiborne Electric Cooperative, Inc. VS Louisiana Generating, L.L.C.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT TAMMANY WASHINGTON - ST. ELECTRIC AND CLAIBORNE 2020 NO. CW 1152 4, 2020 INC. COOPERATIVE, ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. VERSUS LOUISIANA In Re: Louisiana Baton Judicial Rouge, STAY WRIT DENIED; applying for Court, District supervisory Parish East of 695287. No. THERIOT, HIGGINBOTHAM, BEFORE: L. L. C., Generating, 19th writs, DECEMBER L. L. C. GENERATING, JJ. AND WOLFE, DENIED. MRT EW in concur the application to motion portion of the Disqualify its represented Conduct in person that interests informed herein considered " in and Transportation So. 2d Van 57, Ness was breached by the same of be OF As of APPEAL, DEPUTY FOR law CLERK THE the FIRST OF a firm and that thereby of Van it CIRCUIT its to as result, plaintiffs COURT COURT with Ness should herein. so prior Feldman be dispute had not Dept. law 817 representation the and allege in its of of the herein advice pro be of firm provisions legal an are interrelated the plaintiffs that the 5/ 14/ 02), La. that in gives would State, certain find to matters person providing I matter previously v. herein formerly no Two 2001- 2079 ( contract defendant, the Walker opined the revoked representation COURT is reasonable produced connection Feldman Ness Rules client is to represent adverse when they are a has former defendant. two. was and contract. admission should in which Ness with that the commented contract, Van Van related There writing. Development, and Feldman, defendant, in the defendant, thereafter the the Motion of who materially writ which Louisiana the not unless by I Hughes & and firm substantially are the denied judgment filed lawyer a shall related" substance Evidence 60. that client of 2020 of of reverse would law 9( a) part. which Admission the 1. a relationship dissociate to able or Vice to interests firm 9, in Anthony, I Plaintiffs matter substantially fact Hac for denial Talley, November as same s law the of the However, Pro confirmed consent, that firm Rule a former the attorney- client both the person' of judgment provides in client a in the Record LLC, dissents and s attorneys. Professional which Revoke of Generating, and another court' and of attorneys. to Counsel part stay law the trial Motion the in portion its and the Louisiana of of the to disqualify LLC Feldman denial as Knight, denied concurs J., Higginbotham, hac as to vice attorneys disqualified from
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
