Minnie Dantzler VS Fantasia Delacerda, et al

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT MINNIE DANTZLER NO. 2020 CW 1108 VERSUS FANTASIA In DELACERDA, Re: ET Autozone AL. DECEMBER Stores, LLC Greenwich and Court, BEFORE: GUIDRY, WRIT recovery may Kansas or promising person or reduce, pay avoid However, Article evidence when Turcich v. Evidence it is offered So. 2d care 26, trial 2019) . court' for in Motion Sources Limine to evidence the plaintiff' s 2020 and/ or care Transp. & 5/ 20/ 03), 846 to Code the 2019 we to bars providers JMG WIL rc - DEPUTY FOR L11 CLE THE FIRST CIRCUIT bi OF COURT COURT art. exclusion between admissible to of 409. such HMR and pursuant to the La. of the impeaching See Thomas physicians. 8888169, WL grant the the for writ granting Exclude the at * 4( and the Payment relators arrangement PMC OF APPEAL, or mitigate, Evid. purpose La. the plaintiff' s by Collateral from between E. D. reverse introducing HMR of the credibility of the plaintiff' s treating physicians. COURT Dev. So. 2d purpose judgment financial health La. treating Motion it extent the of 1, the by tortfeasor' s not...admissible is the s Accordingly, June s tort furnishing or offering occasioned by an injury arrangement credibility of the plaintiff' v. Chambers, No. CV 18- 4373, Apr. the La. require providers 607 art. received a for another purpose..." See solely La. 505, 508 ( 5th 1992). Cir. App. financial health Evid. not rule, plaintiff' s monies of therefor." does 594 the is property 409 " of losses or liability Baker, of plaintiff' s Code to of 2002- 2349 ( evidence expenses damage or source Louisiana Dept of Co., District 655742. No. injured an Company, JJ. independent sources Ry. Accordingly, " to and 2020 Judicial collateral because reduced, contribution. City 739. Rouge, LANIER, the benefit, S. Baton AND Under be not from procuration East McCLENDON, not may plaintiff 734, of GRANTED. tortfeasor v. Parish Insurance 19th applying for supervisory writs, 30, and the impeaching

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.