Lisa R. Friedley and Robert J. Friedley VS Paul V. Pulido, Gunite Express and Star Indemnity & Liability Company
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT LISA J. FRIEDLEY R. AND 2020 NO. ROBERT CW 0989 FRIEDLEY VERSUS PAUL PULIDO, V. AND EXPRESS, GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY In Raul Re: STAR Company, Liability Continental and WRIT 5, 2020 The GRANTED. judgment by is Friedley, portion JJ. district the District 120260. PENZATO, of Judicial court' October s granting the Motion to Quash and for Protective R. Lisa Plaintiffs, filed Order AND HOLDRIDGE, McDONALD, Indemnity & Company, Insurance 23rd applying for supervisory writs, No. Parish of Ascension, Court, BEFORE: Starr Express, Gunite Pulido, V. 2020 NOVEMBER 23, GUNITE Friedley A party may . . . hereby reversed. " J. Robert and discover facts known by and opinions held by an expert who has been retained or litigation be Defendants, expert who struck by of Kone Cir.), V. Plaintiffs, Instruments, Lisa Quash 525 So. 2d and for GH AHP OF APPEAL, DEPUTY FIRST CIRCUIT 46U AA- - FOR CLERK THE So. 2d 475 ( OF COURT OURT La. v. J. is trailer and Starr the as only that was As repaired. reproducing Burdick 1181 ( 1178, 1988). Protective Friedley and Robert JMM COURT Center of and successfully Winkler, the sold was method Medical Inc., Wayne 2). discovery, warranting examine it before 531 denied, R. to practicable no Fisher -Rabin to expert, opportunity Pulido is writ Motion the the Raul See scene." 5th had there such, " Div. non - testifying Express, Gunite the on 1425( D)( art. Defendants"), circumstances exceptional Friedleys' Pulido, a opinions or P. Civ. to expected not of showing for impracticable is facts Code Company (" Liability Indemnity & demonstrated is who it of anticipation upon which La. V. Raul and obtain subject by other means." Herein, the trial to discovery seeking in party trial under circumstances exceptional same for at witness a as party another preparation or called the by employed specially that Corp., La. App. Accordingly, filed by Order Friedley, a is denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
