Danieka Petit-Blanc VS Quanisha R. Charles and State Farm Mutual Insurance Company

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DANIEKA PETIT --BLANC 2020 NO. CW 0950 VERSUS QUANISHA STATE R. CHARLES FARM AND MUTUAL INSURANCE DECEMBER COMPANY In Re: R. Quanisha Charles Insurance 32nd Mutual Automobile for writs, applying supervisory District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, 187520. WHIPPLE, WRIT Farm 2020 Company, Judicial No. BEFORE: State and 21, C. J., WELCH AND CHUTZ, JJ. DENIED. VGW WRC Welch, 13: 950, I 8, September Insurance within 2020 and herein 13, petition the clerk outside filing fees of the was accident of Delictual actions La. year. be could enclosed petition 2019, period, or herein are Civ. petition 25, force issue at day seven were it occurred was OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 1 DEPUTY FOR CLERK THE OF COURT COURT by after seven letter sent therefore, petition on November the the that the with fell facsimile 18, even of year if letter the the 2018. prescription clerk one petition alleged Accordingly, date original which the The the The court showed 2019, of on filing day delay the evidence 25, court of the of liberative on received filed a 3492. filed for filing suit. COURT to art. deemed and effect. subject Code cover original of clerk clerk Although the November on the facsimile 2019. of petition. the s Automobile clerk applicable 2019, the fees the delivery 22, 26, received and no for November November court petition of November was on the R. S. court' the after by the received 13: 850 that the of issued Accordingly, R. S. filed filing La. exception Mutual requires to to district the holidays, of filing it that the Farm State delivered facsimile facsimile La. and be amendment denied which exclusive 2019. stamped original one days, to pursuant the fees the reverse 13: 850 applicable evidences November was by of and defendant, R. S. the of light writ La. receives notice In the judgment Company. seven court grant filed prescription petition dissents. J., would court time of the and on period

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.