State of Louisiana VS Property seized from Gregory Cox

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA 2020 NO. CW 0901 VERSUS PROPERTY In SEIZED FROM State Re: GREGORY Louisiana, of 23rd DECEMBER 22, COX Judicial for applying District writs, supervisory Parish Court, 2020 of No. Ascension, 114043. BEFORE: McDONALD, WRIT GRANTED. judgment, denying is Strike, to 6) See property." So. 3d La. 694 & State of 144, 320. 00, v. $ 29, 940. 00 Motion is claim 227 U. S. So. 3d 304. is from stricken to failed R. S. La. of information and the in the interest 12/ 4/ La. 12), 2017- 648 Currency, Accordingly, granted the 2020 Barrett, 2012- 0466 ( Strike to 21, specific in JJ. Motion transferor, the of v. $ Louisiana' s Barrett' s acquisition 31/ 17), Alan requirements State 8/ PENZATO, August s Jonathon State Cir. 3d App. his] AND Louisiana' s, of failing to provide of the identity by of [ CHUTZ, court' State mandatory date, the circumstances the Respondent, the 4) & ( concerning " district The with 40: 2610( B)( HOLDRIDGE, relator, reversed. comply 105 McCLENDON, and the respondent forfeiture underlying proceeding. JMM PMc AHP Holdridge 2009- 1193 ( Infinity G35, 144, 320. 00, was no question money court 201.2- 0466 ( proof the case to from that employment. any attempt to violation of the seize of APPEAL, DEPUTY FOR So. 3d in property LINRK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT and a the ownership R. S. it the 824, that and was the assets by the 40: 2610 this in money was fact, earned court v. there in it In his was trial of State where the State. 2003 v. and 694 ( party, money that State question), finding third Since those La. unconstitutional. OF So. 3d factual that employment determination COURT 12), Barrett, his factual technical the a determination a from a 27 105 1/ 20/ 10), 12/ 4/ Unlike could be properly seized by the savings party, La La made Mr. dissent. JJ., owned who court belonged made Barrett of trial that Chutz, and by not the Mr. accumulated has made a by a third State because of money would be illegal and

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.