Jane Doe, Individually and John Doe, Individually and as Natural Tutor for the Minor Child, J.D. VS Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc., Walt Disney Travel Co., Inc., Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Jones Walker, LLP, and Steven D. Felix

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND JOHN DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND 2020 NO. CW 0727 AS NATURAL TUTOR FOR THE MINOR CHILD J. D. VERSUS WALT DISNEY DISNEY In JONES STEVEN brought 1) ( 40: 1231. 8 ( B) ( which Act. Malpractice 701 La. Wilson nom., 758 ex against the See T. W. rel. R. S. 27, Wilson 748 99), Landry, 40: 1157. 1. filed him 2000- 0260 ( v. judgment 2020 is by Therefore, denying the reversed, Felix, the M. Does D. WIL COURT D OF dissents and would deny the writ. APPEAL, UTY FOR C R THE FIRST F CIRCUIT COURT COURT Dr. writ sub is Felix' s exception dismissed GH 97), 3/ 24/ 00), sustained, TMH J., La. this is MRT Wolfe, denied are prejudice. during Medical 98- 2365 rel., writ the claims 10/ 10/ La. ex 655, are the to R. S. in skill within Landry v. So. 2d District found Felix 96- 1575 ( Dowling, also 12/ 28/ fall that action La. panel. Dr. JJ. submitted allegations against the find being to review to v. prematurity filed by Steven D. claims prior medical prematurity of exception filed allegations are July the granted, Baton WOLFE, Judicial Nineteenth the AND we review, novo allegations La. 155; So. 2d de was Lugenbuhl Cir. ist App. LANIER, writs, East of and dereliction of professional 453. 447, So. 2d HOLDRIDGE, in a the lack of consent treatment, Parish i) . Looking a) ( find we petition, for by determined and it as premature a Felix Dr. against is court After GRANTED. WRIT supervisory Court, District THERIOT, HIGGINBOTHAM, BEFORE: for applying 688984. No. Rouge, M. D., Felix, D. Judicial 19th 2020 OCTOBER 21, WALKER, FELIX D. Steven Re: MCCOY O' HARA, P. A., AND INC., CO., SMITH, FORD, WALT INC., TRAVEL WICKER, LLP, PARKS AND US, RESORT, and of the without

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.