State Of Louisiana VS Patrick Rusha, Sr.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA 2019 NO. KW 1447 VERSUS PATRICK In EDWIN Re: RUSHA, Patrick Edwin McCLENDON, WELCH, DENIED THE WRIT in custody. Appeal a apply to notarized and Courts with 4- an 5( C)( opposition of a a judge supervisory Ascension, of and has to 5), ( 9) that no currently been opposition writ counsel, by and Louisiana to comply failing issues, the to the a copy of and filed, was or respondent of 11), memorandum, include the failed statement, of delivered Rules also and ( to the of Courts of opposing Uniform supporting statement failed allegations Relator 4), ( not Louisiana numbers jurisdictional the of copy See is Relator and 4- 5( A). JJ. Relator telephone 2), ( error or that counsel. Rule index, assignments Parish Rules the verifying and 1), ( MADE. Uniform application. respondent opposing Rule include writ addresses Appeal, of for applying Court, HOLDRIDGE, SHOWING certifying the the listing judge the AND the affidavit and to mailed ON Therefore, application Sr., Parish 586374. No. BEFORE: Rusha, Ascension writs, r 0l7in L DEC 0 6 SR. any the return date order is not signed by the respondent judge. Moreover, Rules, bench the we trial that 710 ( 235 ( 1983); court La. cannot Louisiana relator do so Courts elects without application new of to shall U. S. P. be filed for requests items missing of on with noted JEW GH APPEAL, DEPUTY CLERK FOR THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT 2-- 18. 7 & the 4- with before expedited PMC OF and/ 433 246, 1). See obtaining or S. Ct. 78 So. 2d L. Ed. 2d Therefore, at or issue an Uniform 9. this this herein. application In Rules the of event court, he may a return date, and the 2020. The January 6, requirements of consideration, above, Uniform of the copy introduced at Plain, v. judgment application ruling. COURT 104 912. 1( 0)( the a exhibits Rouge 896, Rules comply should any the of include considered. new necessity violation to application Appeal, a of art. review be a Baton of writ not file the application concerning include the this will rehearing copy 464 Crim. adequately of not failed a City denied, Code Supplementation for and See cert. is relator transcript proceedings. La.), it although note and a copy Rule and of 4- 4 must this
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
