State of Louisiana VS Dayton Irving

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT NO. 2019 KW 1320 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS DC' 0 4 2019 DAYTON IRVING In Re: Dayton Irving, applying Judicial District Court, No. 08-17-0865. for supervisory writs, 19th Parish of East Baton Rouge, BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ. The trial judge erred in determining beforehand that an hour and fifteen minutes was a sufficient amount of time for the state and the accused to conduct voir dire. An accused has a constitutional right to "full voir dire examination of prospective jurors and to challenge jurors peremptorily." La. Const. art. I, § 1 7 (A) . See also La. Code Crim. P. art. 786. Imposing an arbitrary time limit on a defendant's voir dire examination has been found to be error in that it is clearly improper and to be avoided by trial courts. See State v. Jones, 596 So.2d 1360, 1367 (La. App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 598 So.2d 373 (La. 1992). The proper procedure would be for the trial judge to be vigilant and to terminate voir dire after the state and the accused have an opportunity for a full voir dire examination and not to establish any arbitrary time limits prior to the voir dire examination. Furthermore, the trial judge has discretion to limit voir dire by excluding repetitive, irrelevant, and improper questions. WRIT GRANTED. PMc JEW GH COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COURT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.