State Of Louisiana VS Anthony Rogers

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA 2019 NO. KW 0882 VERSUS ANTHONY In ROGERS Re: Rogers, Anthony Judicial NOT trial the transcripts court' application telephone Uniform West Baton Rouge, THERIOT, AND s This ruling the of CHUTZ, court as to cannot review adequately include a copy of The hearings. writ failed counsel motion JJ. to suppress is not properly bound, and counsel failed to include the indicating the method of service, verifying Rules of failed failing to extension of to documentation to comply to note a Supplementation will rehearing Louisiana Courts of week judicial of 19, application before or above, original 2019. Rules that the concerning return of date, a timely request MRT OF APPEAL, FOR counsel should no application 9. Rules This presently elects shall to of court for set comply requests for FIRST RK OF THE for an and a copy of this ruling. WRC DEPUTY that the file be a filed with the expedited The application should include the missing items proof imm COURT 4- the minutes. Uniform application and an by and herein, court and/ or 10), and ( statement See is event the 2019, 4- 4 a 2- 18. 7 & trial court, 2, Rule or an Counsel 9), issue at by for review, pertinent application In this August the considered. Appeal, with of consideration. noted be cognizance August requirements writ not 8), ( B). 4- 3, and date. for motion opposition and this of for takes the filed, 4), ( See 5( A) & ( request return presented the of copy 2019 4- 5( C)( issues the include Rule with 4- 2 timely and judge. 4- Rule Rules a addresses the and Appeal, of 22, May original was of Uniform with the noting counsel Courts comply information, opposition and opposing Louisiana the of by failing failing to bill petition, of include failed also the of numbers Counsel on Parish of 18th writs, supervisory affidavit allegations new Court, CONSIDERED. the an District McDONALD, WRIT for applying 2019 180183. No. BEFORE: 24, JULY CIRCUIT COURT COURT extension of the

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.