State Of Louisiana VS Matthew Naquin
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF 2019 NO. LOUISIANA KW 0644 VERSUS MATTHEW In JULY NAQUIN Naquin, Matthew Re: Judicial GRANTED is application drinking AND CHUTZ, WELCH, WRIT IN and alleged based Evid. the on appear that at this and the as Relator' s PART. writ victim' s in date the on the of evidence marijuana question at the issue. at 401 & 403. marijuana evidence court the Thus, With use to erred remainder to the this the to regard prior presented district time. IN fraternity house does appear to Any prejudicial effect of See outweighed by its probative value. be arts. alcohol part, smoking crime would evidence Code La. the to relevant that Rouge, Baton East of JJ. DENIED AND in granted alcohol PENZATO, PART prior to and while he was be Parish Court, District 19th writs, supervisory 10- 17- 0445. No. BEFORE: for applying 2019 02, date in it court, in denying of the victim' s question, does not relator' s motion writ application is It is denied. WRC AHP J., Welch, for essential to order his of There are right to few part hear to jury that ensure deprived in concurs the relator rights present more entirety right fundamental in witnesses of a defendant' s Chambers The jury is entitled to hear the evidence regarding and drug use over the twenty- eight days he is not forced on the COURT prior it or is to OF at to drink to FIRST A('A— f FOR E the K THE J OF COURT COURT death. victim' issue alcohol, CIRCUIT n DEPUTY the issue. APPEAL, all tragic show relevant coerced night his to admissible however, 35 L. Ed. 2d alcohol LSU attended S. Ct. 1049, v. 297 ( 1973). 1038, not defense. a U. victim' s 93 that defense. is and in 410 S. 302, than own trial present evidence Mississippi, the 284, his to part. the of fair a receives constitutional in dissents and the of or The s evidence character whether if he the drank at or issue habit; victim was voluntarily
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
