Lexington National Insurance Company VS State of Louisiana

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT LEXINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE NO. 2019 CW 1022 COMPANY VERSUS STATE In OF Re: State Of 19th BEFORE: No. court, nullity of Court, is St. of Cir. 4/ 4/ AND 5, 2019 is This 672 a by In Mary. lack direct the State So. 2d this 288 So. 2d Civ. 626, P. Piper 629 ( jurisdictional."); 691 9/ 26/ 97), So. 2d is jurisdiction 16th is granting and in its Judicial Civ. P. exceptions venue. to lack Parish of 932( B). TMH WIL OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT r D PUTY CLE FOR THE K OF COURT COURT nullity of remanded St. the this Mary. is Cir. matter which case is Judgment jurisdiction the proceeding La. Louisiana, of matter to Code LSA- C. C. P. court in State subject Ist subject St. Inc., 97- 1415 ( in a art. thus App. which the this AHP COURT is of in proper Parish matter transfer Court, La. La. that P. civil established defendant, of This held Civ. and Accordingly, g y, are Court, of for denied, writ venue sought to be annulled, favor District art. 96- 0346 ( 1244, herein 94- 2475 ( Code waivable the District Supply Co., provided by La. venue not The District instructions with 1234, venue Judicial improper The Boyer, v. State Hardware & nonwaivable."). and rendered Olinde is " 984 (" issued the judgment the exclusive 1974) ( Boyer So. 2d 701 2006 art. La. 2006 art. 1/ 23/ 97), v. La. matter the seeking court grounds the provides also district Judicial Norman, v. 2001, seq., See Baton subject action 16th 407, the of defendant, by and et East of of bond forfeiture is a civil proceeding, actions. writs, JJ. judgment of filed venue, rendered 96), LANIER, exceptions reversed. judgment a Parish 1st March the improper and Louisiana, PENZATO, The denied jurisdiction supervisory Parish 660423. GRANTED. which for applying Court, District HIGGINBOTHAM, WRIT App. Louisiana, Judicial Rouge, of OCT 2 S 2019 LOUISIANA trial court the 16th to Mary pursuant to La. Code

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.