Toshula Carr VS City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge Department of Public Works and Dwight Robinson

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT TOSHULA CARR 2019 NO. CW 0754 VERSUS CITY OF OF BATON ROUGE, EAST BATON ROUGE DEPARTMENT OF AND ROBINSON In DWIGHT Re: PARISH PUBLIC WORKS Mutual Liberty BEFORE: GRANTED. granting the judgment is as a Trustees 876 ( Board Clerks La. of 294 Fund, Sonnier it not 1971); First 0475 ( La. Bank s " is settled require Insurance v. 0637, ( La. Constitutional hearing WL 2019 judgment due 4. Cir. granting 10/ 15), does for a new The judgment 8/ process on a motion 6031783, * 13, 1st App. Liberty her Mutual summary judgment is denied. TMH AHP WIL COURT OF APPEAL, DEPUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT Co., motion contradictory 248 So. 2d require to motion for Insurance for new hearing. 299 ( La. 2017- 57, 4 2014-- Inc., 53, n. 4. a Bank motion the 6031783, * Co., So. 3d First Relief to L. L. C., WL Keller of So. 2d Watermeier contrary a an court 292 Retirement & 2017 not is Board v. nom., Ventures, & summary trial Fund, sub that 181 trial." plaintiff' s denying a Fitness Cir. 1st 12/ 6/ 17), App. unpublished), citing Bracken v. Payne the 2019 judgment vacate" Clark Furthermore, well Trust to Relief Court 13, for motion See judgment the on which refused of 2019 February motion trial, Clerks 1974). Mutual and new writ necessarily Liberty v. Company' s Retirement & the La. 7, the trial new granting. Cir.), of 836 ( assertion, does in Court 1st Trustees for JJ. May s vacate plaintiff' law of App. So. 2d plaintiff' s trial The of to for Insurance second motion matter of motion Mutual LANIER, court' motion reversed. impermissible 874, her 614238. No. AND trial for applying District Court, Company, Judicial Rouge, PENZATO, plaintiff' s Liberty Insurance 19th Baton The denying granting judgment v. East HIGGINBOTHAM, WRIT erred of Fire writs, supervisory Parish OCT 2S 204 contradictory and Trust, 2017 vacate the new triai Company' s February on motion the for

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.