Linda L. Foley VS Judy L. Davis, Trustee of the Kay F. Enright Separate Property Trust

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT LINDA L. FOLEY 2019 NO. CW 0524 VERSUS JUDY THE L. DAVIS, KAY F. PROPERTY In TRUSTEE ENRIGHT OF OCT 1 SEPARATE a19 TRUST Re: Linda L. for Foley, applying District Court, Judicial 21st writs, supervisory Parish Tangipahoa, of No. 2013- 2470. BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WRIT 3 addition, to order does an with Louisiana of not contain of of signed return the this review copy JJ. Courts hearing evidentiary a HOLDRIDGE, Relator failed to comply with Rule 4- Rules properly provided AND CONSIDERED. Uniform application writ In NOT the of WELCH, held was introduced as date herein, this matter, evidence Appeal, and court must the at the order. in be hearing, including a transcript of the live testimony. Finally, review of Although is there 5( C) Rules refer no judgments Burgo, to of." in a judgments a requested single in a single Courts of La. writ Cir. 8/ 5/ application. to and 4- 2 the " consider See 19), against application, Rules issue" application. 1st App. writ Appeal, the " ruling . . . we Therefore, decline supervisory writ prohibition statutory at single 2019- 0612 ( in explicit Louisiana of only complained improperly judgments multiple challenging multiple Uniform has relator and 4- ruling multiple Succession 2019 the WL of 3574213 unpublished). Supplementation this of writ application application for rehearing will not be considered. 2- 18. 7, event Uniform relator Rules such applications comply of Appeal. November with Rule Any 18, must new 2019, Louisiana file to seeks must of new contain 2- 12. 2, GH FIRST CIRCUIT r a DEPUTY FOR CLERK OF THE COURT COURT Rules must be Rules Appeal. with this Louisiana filed on or an 4- 9 and In the court, documentation, of contain a copy of this ruling. JEW OF APPEAL, pertinent Uniform PMc COURT of applications all application and must Courts and/ or and Courts before

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.