Miguel A. Culasso, M.D. VS Doctor's Hospital of Slidell, L.L.C. d/b/a Sterling Surgical Center, DHOSTATE, L.L.C., d/b/a Concentus, et al
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT MIGUEL A. CULASSO, M. D. NO. 2019 CW 0165 VERSUS DOCTOR' S HOSPITAL OF SLIDELL, LLC D/ B/ A STERLING HOSPITAL, DHOSTATE, SURGICAL LLC In D/ B/ A CONCENTUS, Re: Miquel A. writs, 22nd Tammany, BEFORE: WELCH, WRIT merits NOT transcript AL. Culasso, No. AND relator' s the for applying District Court, supervisory Parish PENZATO, This writ JJ. is court application hearing unable to without a December on 4, Supplementation rehearing will of copy 2018, this the event it court, be considered. missing be Courts filed of no contain 9 ail including and Uniform a new 2- 12. 2. 14, of application with documentation, the comply with August Rules 2- 18. 7. pertinent Rule than See file to and must Appeal, later 4- seeks items noted above, Louisiana must Rules relator must the of this writ application and/ or application not Louisiana Courts of Appeal, In the address identification of evidence admitted at the hearing. for St. of 2018- 12903. CHUTZ, of M. D., Judicial CONSIDERED. the of ET JUL 1 1 2019 Uniform Rules Any 2019 new and of application must contain a copy of this ruling. WRC AHP Welch, the it trial J., court' determined Pursuant to subject claims will 1st December the the be Co., Cir. Contractors, Cir. s I 4, 5/ 4/ 12), Inc. 94 v. 12/ 6/ 18), Texas O' APPEAL, 123. FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT an the to the and AAA reverse that extent relator' s arbitrator. Brine 267 respects. COURT of writ claims. Rules in the the arbitrability of the relator' s by E- Claim. com, So - 3d the the of adoption determined LLC grant judgment arbitrability parties' v. would 2018 operating agreements, Transmission App. dissents. So. 3d LLC, Co., 633; See LLC, see 2011- 0978 ( Fla. 2017- 0304 ( also La. Gas La. Jasper App. I would deny the writ in ailother
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
