Zelda Arthur, as the natural tutrix of her minor children, Joy Arthur and Christian Arthur VS East Baton Rouge Parish School Board and Pamela Hamilton-Bourgeous
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT ZELDA ARTHUR, TUTRIX OF AS THE HER MINOR CHILDREN, JOY ARTHUR CHRISTIAN ARTHUR NATURAL 2019 NO. CW 0128 AND VERSUS EAST BATON SCHOOL ROUGE PARISH BOARD AND PAMELA JUN 14 2019 HAMILTON- BOURGEOUIS In Re: East Baton Rouge Parish Hamilton- Bourgeouis, 19th Judicial Rouge, BEFORE: WRIT of the NOT CRAIN, Louisiana trial written 2018; court Courts court' of opinion a application Pamela and writs, supervisory Parish East of Baton in Rule 26, failed violation 4- 5( C)( 2018 the by signed that JJ. Relators Appeal, was of copy Court, HOLDRIDGE, minutes December s AND CONSIDERED. pertinent for applying District Board 657281. No. McDONALD, School opinion to of 10). is indicates court copy in the the Rule provide a 4-- 5( C)( of 7). the The court transcript further directs the a 27, writ in violation of Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts Appeal, of that November on included not a Rules Additionally, judgment trial provide Uniform relators of to hearing so that this court may determine what evidence, if any, was admitted at the hearing on the exception, if any new application copy of on October 15, 2018 if filed. Supplementation application for of Louisiana In this the including application comply with 12. 2. Any rehearing will Courts event it court, this of of Appeal, relators must writ not be Rules seek contain documentation to to considered. 2- 18. 7 & file all show application a that new the application original timely, the missing items noted above, Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, new application must be filed JMM GH OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT THE COURT on Rules oY with documentation, was WJC FOR Uniform an 9. pertinent 2019 and must contain a copy of this ruling. COURT 4- and/ or before and writ must Rule 2- July 1,
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
