Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC VS Texas Brine Company, LLC
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO. 2018 CA 0842 FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC VERSUS R TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC, ET AL. Judgment Rendered: AUG 0 ' 2019 On Appeal from The 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Assumption, State of Louisiana Trial Court No. 34316 The Honorable Thomas J. Kliebert Jr., Judge Presiding Leopold Z. Sher Attorneys for Appellant/Defendant, James M. Garner Third -Party Plaintiff, Texas Brine Company, LLC Peter L. Hilbert Jr. Jeffrey D. Kessler New Orleans, Louisiana Robert Ryland Percy III Gonzales, Louisiana Eric J. Mayer Houston, Texas Travis J. Turner Gonzales, Louisiana Matthew J. Randazzo III Attorneys Christopher B. Bailey Defendant, Will Montz Browning Oil Company, Inc. for Appellee/ Third-Party Lafayette, Louisiana BEFORE: GUIDRY, McDONALD, AND CRAIN, JJ. CRAIN, J. Texas Brine Company, LLC, against Browning Oil Company, appeals a judgment dismissing its claims Inc., pursuant to a motion for involuntary dismissal. We affirm. This is one of several lawsuits arising out of a sinkhole in Assumption Parish that developed on or about August 3, 2012, following the collapse of a salt mine cavern. Florida Gas Transmission Company sued Texas Brine, among other defendants, alleging Texas Brine' s salt mining operations caused the collapse of the cavern and the resulting sinkhole, which damaged two of Florida Gas' s nearby pipelines. Texas Brine filed an incidental demand against Browning Oil, which from 1991 to 2001 operated a nearby oil and gas well, sometimes referred to as the AH1 well." The litigation proceeded to a " Phase 1: Liability" trial that was limited to the following issues: ( 1) the duties owed by the non -insurer parties, ( 2) non -insurer parties breached the duty or duties owed, and ( 3) whether any if one or more non - insurer parties breached a duty or duties, whether the actions or inactions of that party caused any legally cognizable damages to any claimant. After Texas Brine rested its case, Browning Oil moved for an involuntary dismissal of Texas Brine' s claims against it, arguing the evidence failed to establish any fault by Browning Oil that caused the sinkhole. As summarized by Browning Oil' s counsel, " There' s no factual evidence that Browning Oil Company in sitting there producing that well for ten years ... damaged the salt, did any damage to anything, and when they walked away, the cavern was fine." The trial court agreed and granted the motion, signing a judgment on October 31, 2017, dismissing Texas Brine' s claims against Browning Oil. Texas Brine appeals. The arguments presented by Texas Brine were addressed in a related appeal decided by this circuit, Pontchartrain 2 Natural Gas System v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, 18- 0631, 2019VWL2865136 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 7/ 3/ 19), So. 3d which affirmed a similar judgment granting the same motion for involuntary dismissal. For the reasons provided in Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, affirm the October 31, 2017 judgment.' we This memorandum opinion is issued in accordance with Uniform Rules— Courts of Appeal, Rule 2- 16. 1B. All costs of this appeal are assessed to Texas Brine. AFFIRMED. Texas Brine also seeks review herein of a partial summary judgment signed on August 23, 2017, dismissing Texas Brine' s claims against Browning Oil under Louisiana law in effect before 1996. For the reasons provided in Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, we find no error in the partial summary judgment. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
