Sheila Reed VS Dolgencorp, LLC, Dollar General Corporation, DNG Alexandria, Louisiana Partnership, Employees of Dollar General Corporation

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT SHELIA REED 2018 NO. CW 0038 VERSUS DOLGENCORP, LLC, CORPORATION, LOUISIANA DOLLAR In DOLLAR DNG ALEXANDRIA, PARTNERSHIP, GENERAL Re: EMPLOYEES 21st Livingston, PETTIGREW, WRIT DG no GRANTED. Louisiana, Code or had caused the her or District CRAIN, novo supervisory Court, Parish 966( A)( in 3). dispute, as " Dolgencorp, as a matter or that knowledge applicant of elements Wal- Mart 1084; Ross v. that LLC of by substance on that 966( D)( 1). material La. Code 1st issues factual Civ. judgment Motion Motion claims support remain So. 3d Holt by Dolgencorp, is to reversed, seeking and to Accordingly, Louisiana, LLC ( P. the all art. of a motion. La. App. 2013- 1161 trial court' Louisiana, Louisiana, dismiss on not was evidence denied, DG 99- 1741 Civ. of the La. establish 2012- 1579 ( Accordingly, 2018 denying DG granted. to Code writ v. 1081, incumbent was granting 184, White So. 2d denied, produce Torino, for one or applicant La. 267. 22, DG v. 182, for Summary Judgment for Judgment Summary it it that 98- 1036 ( Inc., that or the mandates So. 3d January against 699 writ created plaintiff See sufficient law. of plaintiff is plaintiff with of 117 910, matter 967( B); 120 dated a dispute 4/ 26/ 13), 8/ 30/ 13), La. as 913, Thereafter, fact of art P. 9/ 9/ 97), La. So. 2d 444. factual failure The Cir. So. 2d judgment to 9: 2800. 6. R. S. La. condition established La. d/ b/ a law. defendant any Giant. Super Markets, 734 produce genuine entitled 99), 748 under 97- 0393 ( Inc., 5/ 14/ to plaintiff claim Schwegmann Cir. 10/ 1/ 99), La. her Stores, 1st App. of there testified who the JJ. applicant, would be unable to carry her burden of proof at trial more of PENZATO, that that the presence of any constructive Thus, find we and Plaintiff, fall, the review, judgment identify of HOLDRIDGE AND named to fall. to de entitled cause actual our genuinely incorrectly not for applying 152463. No. art. could floor, the Judicial Under is P. deposition, al., HIGGINBOTHAM, LLC ( General") Civ. et facts material Dollar JUL 1 6 2018 LLC, Dolgencorp, BEFORE: OF CORPORATION writs, are GENERAL s LLC' s LLC' s plaintiff' s claims asserted as incorrectly d/ b/ a are hereby dismissed, and each party is to bear its own costs. against LLC prejudice, Dollar named General") AHP WJC GH Pettigrew and Higginbotham, writ. COURT OF APPEAL, PUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT JJ., dissent and would deny the

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.