State Of Louisiana VS Anthony Caminita

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF 2017 NO. LOUISIANA KW 1048 VERSUS c ANTHONY In PAUL Re: Anthony 22nd by the 2017 in of effect at 520. 518, in fact effect mere possible So. 2d of penalty offense at amendment supervisory writs, of St. Tammany, 520. a to be 426 of So. 2d may be 118, is accused 820 6/ 21/ 02), the law sentencing commission 130 - 131 ( subsequently of La. amended, under the there former is retroactively. statute. WRC VGW JMM OF APPEAL, PUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST Or CIRCUIT COURT COURT the 1983). after Sugasti, 820 no indication that any the district Accordingly, court did not err by denying the motion to modify sentence. COURT must Sc. 2d so as to modify or lessen the does not extinguish liability imposed, Furthermore, apply time The offense the convicted La. 2017). 1, statute. of 67), amended crime, committed would the August goods commission was sentenced according to the statute the of 14: R. S. La. 14: 67( 10)), effective which be JJ. statute ( R. S. 2001 - 3407 ( Narcisse, that commission at CHUTZ, theft the penalty Sugasti, v. 1( the of A defendant must The the the v. State for time of offense. the under AND La. 281, § No. the State provisions for Parish Court, theft statute ( prosecuted determinative suffer. general goods Acts La. was District McDONALD The DENIED. theft Relator applying Caminita, C. J., WHIPPLE, WRIT not Paul Judicial 531, 694. No. BEFORE: r y oc y 1 u 20S CAMINITA

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.