Oana Crasi VS Larry Steven Crow

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT OANA CRASI NO. 2017 CW 1386 VERSUS LARRY In STEVEN Re: CROW Oana OCTOBER Crasi, Judicial for applying District Court, 13, supervisory Parish 22nd writs, St. of 2017 No. Tammany, 2017 - 12843. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, WRIT has GRANTED the The most on court at recent very according PART. her parent' s the of personal 3945 art. to custody the IN of in A parent child when Wood unfitness. have minor 3945 based apparently a non - arrangements made child recommendation since is case 2017 visitation long the Art. this 20, September custody 2017 DENIED arrangement on ruling 2, JJ. 1974). custody Civ. CHUTZ, ORDER; the absent La. minimal Code August which, WITH to 675 ( temporary La. the PART non - parent oral The parent. McDONALD AND right So. 2d brief a continuing in a 290 Beard, on IN superior challenged by v. C. J., with The recommendation, the by approved elapsed. hearings relator was to have been given an opportunity to present evidence either did give not her constraints, documents is for did or the unfitness set opportunity supplied in now that on the not to part of mother, of the to court' s at all. It court that the occur this custody the due a non - parent, the mother, and with no thus no at child set the issue finding any specific further hearing time from appears minor without with purported of visitation for some six months. The is matter remanded in instructions with hearing allowed for the parties to present schedule a temporary placement hearing this or on ruling regarding 2017. November 6, To the of which the minor before temporary extent a the reasonable application WRC VGW JMM COURT D OF APPEAL, UTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT The 2017 27, custody denied. court of to time the is evidence regarding the proper child. October for amount and court and visitation seeks other shall issue on a or relief, conduct written before it is

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.