Michelle L. Williams, Individually and On Behalf of Her Minor Child, Travis Barber, III VS Bradford Latham, Allstate Insurance Company, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT MICHELLE L. WILLIAMS, INDIVIDUALLY AND OF CHILD, HER MINOR BARBER, ON 2016 NO. CW 1055 BEHALF TRAVIS III VERSUS BRADFORD LATHAM, INSURANCE FARM ALLSTATE COMPANY, MUTUAL AND STATE OCT 16 2016 AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY In Allstate Re: Insurance applying Court, BEFORE: Company supervisory writs, for Parish of East Baton 19th Rouge, WHIPPLE, C. J., DENIED. On the showing made we WRIT Bradford and District 607657. No. GUIDRY AND McCLENDON, Latham, Judicial JJ. find no error. VGW JMG McClendon, that the for Petition Williams, Barber, dissents J., and would filed Damages by individually and on behalf III, 14, December on 2011, the grant Michelle plaintiff, of her was minor find I writ. child, prescribed its on L. Travis face and that plaintiff bore the burden of proof of establishing that her claims Roba, 47 were Inc. So. 3d year Code for that Mutual Civil this period for was 3105( B) Code the lst App. to delictual because plaintiff suspended. that 8/ 10/ 10), the raised claims to or Cir. establish interrupted pursuant Automobile of Insurance 3105( B) Accordingly, trial Exception court would OF Prescription APPEAL, PUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF and CIRCUIT COURT COURT Company be Louisiana failed to one - in the Civil allege would that such applicable I would reverse the Allstate denying Prescription. D La. failed the interrupted or she either participated in or made any submission between Allstate Insurance Company and State article suit. COURT were 2009 - 0508 ( Plaintiff Damages or arbitration the Farm of 506. article establish prescribed Courtney, v. 500, prescriptive Petition to not to July her 11, the in 2016 ruling Insurance sustain Louisiana claims Company' s Exception of
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
