Tony Chaney VS Board of Review, and Ronnie Falgout, Jr.; Individually and his Official Capacity, and Joseph Sevario; Individually and his Official Capacity, and Arthur Bourgeois; Individually and his Official Capacity, and Gloria Berthalot; Individually and his Official
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT TONY CHANEY 2016 NO. CW 0806 VERSUS BOARD OF REVIEW AND FALGOUT, JR., AND HIS AND JOSEPH INDIVIDUALLY OFFICIAL CAPACITY, SEVERIO; INDIVIDUALLY AND CAPACITY, AND BOURGEOIS, HIS HIS OFFICIAL ARTHUR INDIVIDUALLY OFFICIAL GLORIA RONNIE CAPACITY, BERTHALOT; INDIVIDUALLY AND HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AND MITCHELL; INDIVIDUALLY HIS OFFICIAL RONALD AND AND J. BRENDA AND CAPACITY, AND HARRISON; INDIVIDUALLY CAPACITY, AND HIS DALE R. OFFICIAL BURGER; INDIVIDUALLY AND HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, PAUL M. CASADABAN; INDIVIDUALLY AND HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AND LINETTE WATSON; INDIVIDUALLY AND CAPACITY, PRIVATE In AND HIS THE OFFICIAL NEW ORLEANS OCT 162016 PATROL Re: Tony Chaney, for applying supervisory District Court, Parish of East Judicial No. BEFORE: Baton Rouge, 608216. WHIPPLE, WRIT 19th writs, NOT C. J., GUIDRY AND MCCLENDON, CONSIDERED. Relator failed JJ. to with comply the return date requirements of Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, timely an Rules filed. 5( 0)( Rules 11). entire 4- 3 in Louisiana of future Any contents above, and that the of Courts filing this on and Courts of application application, a Appeal, Rules Appeal, of this copy of this ruling. application in with compliance new writ 4 - 2, 4- 3 If issue the relator 4 - 5, 4- 3 not item elects Rules which of on or before November 14, to 4- and include missing Uniform and Rules should the noted file a Louisiana includes of a timely extension to the return date was obtained, so was Nor does the application contain documentation of of the return date set by the district court. See extension Uniform 4- 2 proof he may do 2016. VGW PMC J., Guidry, Relator made. court' of s the noted in May 2, August this dissents and would deny the writ on the showing has 2016 26, failed to make any showing that the district rulings 2014 denying judgment Court' s April 20, is a hearing erroneous. and modification Moreover, as 2015 action dismissing relator' s STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 2016 appeal was in 2014 - 1600, conditional 2015 - 1166 and relator interlocutory. appeal, party relief in lacked appealed Neither judgments. appealable an relator a judgment favor that is of For must whom granted Technology Investors, So. 2d 598, OF APPEAL, or D PUTY FOR FIRST CLERK OF THE June a 24, this Court 2015 contain judgment CIRCUIT La. to have App. which were language, and Jenkins 1st 2) which Cir. v. in was final, jurisdiction ordered, See OF Additionally, judgment decretal is 2 0806 judgment, a judgments those denied. of language. of 2002 - 1788 ( COURT COURT review decretal 600. COURT the sought CW PAGE NO. over name the state the Recovery 6/ 27/ 03), 858
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
