State Of Louisiana VS Roosevelt D. Jones

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF 2015 NO. LOUISIANA KW 1607 VERSUS JONES ROOSEVELT D. In Roosevelt Re: 18th return date requirements application to 2015. writ This be for affidavit Louisiana Relator an 11), her bar filed the on on October properly comply 4 - 5( B). her 35: 12( A) & ( binding B) . and Supplementation Rule notary or number, R. S. the with The notarized. La. See number. timely Relator' s date. identification 15, appears a of of the the October 2015, 16, return file required before or Courts timely documentation original notary of to order the with comply Louisiana failing no be of date Court is to to requirements by this of roll Rules to page of this application and / or an application for rehearing will not be Rules January this 25, with on See consideration. the Rule also issue on this application, the the before Rule include items noted PMc FIRST CIRCUIT t 9, )a- DEPUTY FOR CLER F THE COU OURT of an the above, scheduled file be and and new the the with expedited Any a of comply for contents and a delivered extension D) . entire is 2015, herein, concerning 12) & ( 4- 5( C)( JMM APPEAL, shall 28, Appeal, of to requests MRT OF case elects December ruling. COURT this application deficiencies should missing in relator documentation 4 - 4, Courts Louisiana trial event Court, include of of the the or correct requirements filing in this should date, return 2016, Court application Because 4 - 9. 2 - 18. 7 & Rules Uniform See application the in appear failed considered. to Baton West of JJ. failed return there and not state Uniform application, include also numbering of extension does to failed writ filed THERIOT, Relator The be untimely, request AND 4- 5( C)( application. writ for and 4- 3 Rules Appeal, to McCLENDON CONSIDERED. NOT writs, supervisory Parish 131415. No. McDONALD, WRIT for applying Court, District Judicial Rouge, BEFORE: Jones, D. copy future of this of this

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.