Bryan Gibbs, Brandon Gibbs and Treneka Young VS The Hanover Insurance Company, Jim Carey Distributing Company and Jody Walker

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT BRYAN AND GIBBS, BRANDON GIBBS, 2015 NO. CW 0867 TRENEKA YOUNG VERSUS THE HANOVER COMPANY, INSURANCE JIM CAREY DISTRIBUTING JODY In COMPANY AND Re: Jim Carey Distributing Company for Company, applying Insurance 21st No. BEFORE: Judicial WRIT HOLDRIDGE, DENIED. In there accidents/ claims were 5/ 30/ 14) , 152 1/ 157 So. 3d 16/ 15) , 749, rev' d in McCormick' s be false 909, Hanover writs, supervisory Parish Tangipahoa, of on other Handbook that App. Law other under such inferred. ( La. 1 App. See 2014- 2246 denied, Coastal v. Marine, 1985) , Cir. 488 of claims the occurred 2012- 1868 writ lst prior fraud may be Co. , Daigle of that showing fraudulent or grounds, of introduction 925- 926, ( La. JJ. a or 1129; 750- 751 part seek to Louisiana So. 3d So. 2d Court, CHUTZ, circumstances Kiewit v. AND order must highly suspicious Maldonado District The and 2011- 0004151 . GUIDRY, evidence, ed. OCT 0 Z 2015 WALKER So. 2d 679 Evidence, § ( La. 482 Inc. , granted writ 196, Cir. ( La. 1986) and ( citing 466- 467 pp. ( 2d 1972) ) . GH WRC Guidry, dissents J. , portion of in the limine evidence and would 13, 2015 April to as evidence repeated of claims writ, denying other of prior the grant order reversing defendants' When claims . of a similar that motion is there the nature, may be relevant to show that plaintiffs have exceeded likely chances of repeated, accidental injury of the same In such a situation, the evidence may be admitted if the evidence their kind. proponent Haynes 1/ 29/ 97) , 695 of produces Best 688 So. 2d 1355 . the probative 402, art . acts of value prejudicial effect; 403, discretion, COURT OF APPEAL, TY FOR circumstances evidence CLERK THE and 1) . I in claims FIRST OF the thus, 404 ( B) ( accidents by committed the of this greatly limiting in is the Williamson 97- 1145 App. ( La. in this outweighs the admission connection evidence court of the potential admissible. trial v. Cir. matter. believe I case, 4 6/ 20/ 97) , substantial plaintiffs evidence made See ( La. presented believe CIRCUIT COURT COURT fraud. 95- 1725 of denied, writ defendants therefore, prior DE 1201, Here, unique evidence Alexandria, of So. 2d fraudulent Under other Western La. abused C. E. its plaintiffs' therewith.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.