Gustave J. Labarre, Jr. VS Occidental Chemical Company and Texas Brine Company, L.L.C.

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT GUSTAVE J. LABARRE, JR. CHEMICAL COMPANY 2014 NO. CW 1739 VERSUS OCCIDENTAL AND In TEXAS BRINE Re: COMPANY, LLC JAN 2 3 2015 Insurance Liberty Underwriters, 23rd supervisory Parish of Assumption, writs, BEFORE: WHIPPLE, WRIT GRANTED. judgment court ' s Underwriters judgment attorney that is matter La. J. substantial will not Turner' s enough to P. is district his for Judge employed which art. that ground The recuse is in the as an for Moreover, matter withdrawal In recusal. and Alvin ground a 151 ( A) ( 3) . participation such the MOOT. denying Liberty is hereby reversed, Turner Civ. JJ. Insurance motion J. AS Judge Turner, Code cure DENIED recuse Travis cause before HIGGINBOTHAM, 2014, the granting that Travis STAY 6, to motion recusal. mandatory far find in the find s entered We FOR November for applying Court, District 33796. No. McCLENDON AND MOTION of Inc. ' is Turner. we C. J. , Inc. , Judicial thus from the Aetna re Casualty and Surety Company, 919 F. 2d 1136 ( 6th Cir. 1990) . We also note that a judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which the judge ' s might be impartiality reasonably See questioned. Folse v. Transocean So. 2d 872 court 467 . for 3 ( C) Canon Offshore Therefore, reallotment of the of USA, Code is matter this to Judicial 2004- 1069 Inc. , case this of remanded another Conduct; ( La. to 5/ 7/ 04) , the district Division. PMc Whipple, C. J. , In concurs. so ruling, we express no opinion at this time as to whether the timing of the attorney' s enrollment mandates other action against any party herein, given that his enrollment at generated apparently judge. Thus, basis this Nephew, 149 the is rights reserved 899, OF APPEAL, k D J. , FIRST FOR CLERK THE OF COURT - of these ( La. seek proceedings recusal mandating parties . 2014- 433 CIRCUIT COURT stage any party to the concurs . CN) rel, PUTY of 906- 07 . Higginbotham, COURT later conflict to 2013- 1409, Inc. , So. 3d the the the further action on Grabowski App. of has 3d Cir. v. Smith & 10/ 1/ 14) ,

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.