Patricia H. Minaldi VS The Louisiana State Employees Retirement System, An Agency of the State of Louisiana
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT PATRICIA H. MINALDI 2014 NO. CW 1736 VERSUS LOUISIANA STATE RETIREMENT AGENCY OF EMPLOYEES ' SYSTEM, THE AND STATE OF MAR 0 9 2015 LOUISIANA In Re: Board Trustees of Retirement 19th BEFORE: WRIT judgment as Board La. district judgment, amount of LASERS] any with replacement deducted as a reasonable and/ or from, return not result a amount of her employees ' form, account Acceptance of a benefits . and We dismiss officer refund cancels automatically 11 : 537C. Otherwise, hereby Judge all Judge grant JMG 6 CIRCUIT aPUTY FOR CLERK OF THE COURT COURT for "the into placed by into State funds said benefits and apply prejudice the which her [ LASERS] for a credited of and were account or its refund of the her in the to filing with LASERS of the LASERS' Minaldi' s FIRST not to on motion behalf her on return agency. La.. accumulated in. Minaldi JEW APPEAL, with claim related decision rights MRT OF or funds of prejudice. COURT [ of] may to 966B ( 2) . art. the requisite it has been certified by the appointing after authority or personnel her or no entitled is P. dismiss to contributions upon it Civ. State is there in denying LASERS' system all to, Minaldi accumulated savings application of unilateral Judge representative. " Baton Louisiana alternative by rate dedicated of Code sought The that and second retirement of established erred deposited other a court which Minaldi' s funds all or Louisiana H. of Trustees law. of the Patricia writs, East of JJ. fact matter for summary Employees ' supervisory Parish (" LASERS") material Accordingly, Judge THERIOT, System to as a AND The Retirement issue genuine WELCH GRANTED. Employee' s applying Court, State 508, 121 . No. GUIDRY, for District Judicial Rouge, Louisiana the of System, the can motion second system. R. S. 11: 537A. contributions La. R. S. for retirement apply for summary judgment alternative claim with
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
