State Of Louisiana VS Richard Lagarrigue
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
JTP JEW ruling. this of this copy of filing if a and above, noted contents future entire Any requirements 26, January this with 9. 4- the writ 1983). 235 ( denied, cert. See at filed new a file not this 246, proceedings that it although to failed and the of note he numbering page- the S.R. in La. See comply not is the before notary 95the by sworn recitation Herein, 2724, 95- Duhon, fact However, that the the a v. State is is legal JJ. 896, a of Parish who writs, supervisory i4 U L.U j ~ t': r, C\ 1v ; IJ ~:~. for of a not is given in District it that Uniform or the from 96), 21/ 5/ made definitive made be Lagarrigue, absent 2726 ( writing s affidavit' must CONSIDERED. NOT Judicial that La. is an notary s attorney' the oath. under There is affidavit. verification 674 binding Rules In oath. under 2d So. applying issue B) 12 (35: . unclear WELCH, AND PETTIGREW Court, 464 to failed Relator Louisiana any a and include KUHN, 02597. 13Tangipahoa, S. U. requirements statement See no is s court' Accordingly, violation failed characteristic form. particular requirement this or and/ B),5 ( ( 4- Rules with comply addition, was 944, of of signed Thus, any 946. the to relator statement the that an failed an v. Rouge Baton of City ~ C) ( Courts written In 104 Rule comply Appeal, of to statement noticeably with verification. the A),5 ( 4- Rule with 8), 45( the herein. ruling the of copy 9). and ( 8) and event Rules Uniform application Court 2015, Court, lain, Rules, Uniform Moreover, also relator and the exhibits any of copy transcript we the Ct.S. La.), 710 ( 2d So. 433 hearing. the at introduced relator for on 4, 4- Rule application elects cannot this applicable. concerning of Supplementation adequately 78 See Courts Louisiana of will rehearing 2d Ed.L. application, issue also application shall to the should requests be on Appeal, of review the for should considered. be trial include with comply application application missing 12) &C) ( ( ( 5 4- Rule or before 7 & 2- Rules 18. See an the D). consideration, expedited of items affidavit WRIT BEFORE: No. 21st Re: In Richard LAGARRIGUE RICHARD VERSUS 1613 KW 2014 NO. LOUISIANA OF CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT LOUISIANA OF STATE STATE COURT THE FOR D~~~ CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF application. writ the deny and consider would 2) OF 2 J., Kuhn, PAGE 1613 KW 2014 CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT LOUISIANA OF STATE COURT
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
