State Of Louisiana VS Spencer Elzie

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

CO THE FOR OF CLERK DEPUTY A IG~ CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT JEK JEW JTP sentence. offender habitual illegal an correct trial to the motion habitual a condition as that distribution 13), 5/ 3/ App. underlying habitual the for those La. to S. R. La. by underlying not did law was 1, any offender 69, § No. Acts language the La. 2010 labor" hard at JJ. is by cocaine was of 12), 25/ 5/ 72 11), 26/ 7/ See offense. statute offender offense. underlying required sentence to a s relator' Because to, additions provisions habitual allowed v. State by court offender. legal 3d So. A the did 406 & 3d So. 90 392, conditions of for computed than rather required a sentence not La. See component Douglas, sentencing err underlying 398, by enhanced provisions felony the referring of, replacements in S. R. 2508 ( 2012- writs 2039 ( 2010- under of sentence felony La. denied, the the at conviction 2307 ( 2011- Cir. 1st s relator' labor, hard for denying b). 4) ( B) ( 967 ( 40: sentence 474. 3d So. 115 La. s relator' Accordingly, sentencing G) 1(529. 15: G) 1(529. 15: The condition the " Although conditions are offense. the modify that of S.R. La. to DENIED. WELCH, AND PETTIGREW KUHN, addition added WRIT BEFORE: 77846. No. 21st Tangipahoa, of Parish writs, supervisory for Court, District applying Judicial Elzie, Spencer Re: In ELZIE SPENCER 2014 3 0 NOV VERSUS 1202 KW 2014 NO. LOUISIANA OF STATE CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT LOUISIANA OF STATE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.