State Of Louisiana VS Clarence Zahn

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT THE FOR COURT OF CLERK DEPUTY LJ c- J.~ h. 0-..::::, j~_.[-- c r, APPEAL, OF COURT CIRCUIT FIRST application. writ the would deny and dissents J., Pettigrew, JEK PMc chooses. so he if plea guilty his withdraw to allowed be should the whether determine to ordered is court district the time which at hearing restitution a hold to court district restitution is and vacated this is matter to remanded the defendant 03), 14/ 3/ La. 2054 ( 31. 2d So. 839 Accordingly, of condition the App. La. 02), 21/6/ Cir. 1st 156, 2d 822So. 2002- denied, writ vitiated. was agreement plea 3030 2001- Roberts, v. State See litigation. rror,e: this of Because parties' the the to consent civil through determined be to restitution of amount the allow 1993) ( curiam). per to agreed it when erred court trial The damages).nonpecuniary Diaz, v. State La. 1337 ( 1336, 2d So. 615 sanctions enforce to of collection damages ( civil including by caused criminal activity and on not providing criminal 1 895. focuses on primarily for restitution losses pecuniary Criminal of Code Louisiana article Procedure JJ. Parish for writs, supervisory Tangipahoa, of GRANTED. WRIT McCLENDON, AND PETTIGREW KUHN, BEFORE: 700259. No. Court, District Judicial 21st Louisiana, of State applying 2014 41 dUL ZAHN Re: In CLARENCE VERSUS 0694 KW 2014 NO. LOUISIANA OF STATE CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT LOUISIANA OF STATE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.