State Of Louisiana VS Christopher J. Cheramie

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT SmATE Oc OCIISIANA 2014 N0. KW 0352 VERSUS CHRISTOPHER In Re : J. MAY 0 5 2014 CHERAMIE Christoptie: J. lit. rl writs, Cher Judicial Lafourche, Ivo. PETTIGREW, BEFORE: McDONALD, WRIT Miller DENIED. GOi2 ) does 3?_ 9 844 Accor: upon the relator' s States that his in w s cour* to ed Parisr of was this witn he Miller senter. c- roirt light * ing as So . 3d 2014) . ruli_ nq w"rierein of he the he United same reasons, once orrectly hea ng 130 26, sentence For ir, 407 postconviction 13) , iristrurr_ ions, s L . Ed. 2d February in Miller. ourt' tria deci.sion 3 in denying/ not gal ilLe; ai in sioa 1 11/ 5/ on err Il Court state ( La . fi_ ed an JJ. 2455, r. :_ 2? 63 did rot correct sertence rendered, eariier- schedu 2^ 1- certior; ri Cour*_ dec- accordance decision supervisory Court, Supreme S . Ct . retroactively trial motion Sunreme ates 13 Tate, v. for petition inaly, ciaimed ar. d ( Jr_ ited app- y State :)strict AND McCI,ENDON, O. S. noT prcceedings . for applying 2000- C- 35i599 . The Alabama, v. mie, the Tate dismissed tne In the moot. 2ve t that the Cn;_ r2d States Supreme Co: rt renders a decision on the huve retroactivity one el.ief. from year See La . Millez of C any de C; thet rim. P. art . JMM PMc JTP OUF'° OF APPEAL, F' Ikc' C CT_ RCOIT n, A r JEP'7' P7 ;, OR : LFBK F : i; r CN R COUR. --- o T rru] es decision suc: to Tate, seek 930 . dA (; . the relator wi11 appropriate

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.