State Of Louisiana VS Edward Nelson McCray
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OE LOUISIANA 2014 N0. KW 0231 VERSUS EDWARD In NELSON Re: McCRAY Edward 22nd Nelson PAFtRO, WRIT District GUIDRY DENIED. application for AND The leading See Code P. Crim. court did not 5 & 7. of relator' s sixth of counsel on 8 object force cellular claims light fact murder 1979) . U. counsel unless the trial motion La . court for a 99 the Code did S . Ct . court Crim. P. err in not relief, the appointment APPEAL, FOR viewing counsel CLERK THE FIRST OF motion of CIRCOIT COURT OURT 1, failed claim that with is and the is the are that the and his also without evidence rational of doubt . not dangerous meritless, any 2781, another by a contention is elements reasonable 319, 2789, in trier second See 61 required 930 . 7 ( C) . o£ degree Jackson L. Ed. 2d to the v. 560 appoint of Accordingly, denying the application for or for evidentiary hearing, art . counsel . EGD DEPUTY trial assistance control of contention prosecution, JMG OF the this object armed victim essential beyond 307, The Relator' s the after the appellate while this the effective However, immediate RHP COURT proceedings it orders an evidentiary hearing on the merits postconviction the S. See claim. upon to Additionally, the to importantly, prover. 443 in the belong found an the have to belong to the person from Armed robbery is the taking of 19 : 64 ( A) . based l: ave were Virginia, is to favcrable could the which considering the merits to merit . taken. R. S . had right where intimidation, are More most if relief claim Therefore, C) . appeal. without that La. phone that merit . his violated direct was or See weapon. a in raise err by not that was are anything of value of to deny may alleges 930 . 4 ( B) & ( a rcbbery does not the use claim on 9, & subject of whom writs, Tammany, inexcusably failed to pursue on appeal . court did appeal claims 2, court relief failed art . The trial clais: s St. of abuse its discretion by not considering claims 3, raise supervisory Parish JJ. trial inexcusabiy to convic* ion or to for Court, DRAKE, postconviction petitioner La. applying McCray, Judicial 404879 . No. BEFORE : JUN O G 2074
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
