Mary Earthly on Behalf of Dorothy Jones VS CPlace University SNF, LLC d/b/a Affinity Nursing and Rehab Center and ABC Insurance Company
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT MARY EARTHLY DOROTHY ON BEHALF 2014 NO. OF CW 1215 JONES VERSUS CPLACE UNIVERSITY D/ B/ A AFFINITY REHAB CENTER SNF, LLC NURSING AND AND ABC OCT 21 201 r INSURANCE COMPANY In Cplace University, Rehab Center, Re : Judicial PARRO, WRIT trial from intentional C as acts the of may be in intentional provisions the of La. abuse; which in and other alleges at the trial and are an Paragraph and manner; 40 : 1299 . 47 ( B) . R. S . the alleges tort revealed arise case, the of which materials petition, the physical and petition, dangerous and of that B subsection mental the of find We part . 14, judgment 2014 3, inappropriate with E in Paragraph inappropriate subsection this Rouge, Baton JJ. September vacated in subsection restraints intentional on East of and 19th writs, supervisory Parish CRAIN, The PART. alleges 14, AND hereby which improper IN contained unreasonable, 14, McDONALD is court allegations Paragraph d/ b/ a Affinity Nursing for Court, District GRANTED petition, LLC applying 629257 . No. BEFORE: SNF, the merits therefore exempt of The exception of prematurity is denied with respect to these claims . The trial evidence 930 . art . court the at The evidence in erred hearing trial is court during the patient' s medical to the reconsider evidence and 2002- 2552 Hamilton Cir. in ( La. 12/ 8/ App. Baton v. 10) , of 52 So. 3d prematurity Cir. Health 330 . COURT OF concurs. APPEAL, UTY CLERK FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT v. D & 11/ 7/ Care, 03) , W La. and negligence of JMM J. , alleged or consider and to admit care, REP Crain, to ordered McKnight lst Rouge admit pursuant treatment exception light matter the whether regarding to refusing this of C. C. P. consider occurred confinement, in light Health 873 2009- 0849 of Servs. , and such Inc. , So. 2d 18, and ( La. App. 1st
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
