Angelle Leonard Hinkle VS Shannon Hinkle
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COU~ T OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT LEONARD ANGELLE HINKLE NO. 0863 CW 2014 VERSUS HINKLE SHANNON In Re: writs, child seeks governs seq., On dispute. err did not as in not does Thus, exception of as to the grant we judgment 2014 13, La. portion the the Mrs. state" 1813( A); UCCJEA the divorce Hinkle's June and modify the declinatory Hinkle's Mr. court district R.S. et this in granted only jurisdiction is custody the of minor the writ is denied. In all other respects, child. 13: 1801 However, seeking petition the of Child R. S. See La. in part that subject matter Custody child's " horne the over writ provide to lack of is 13: 1816. R.S. jurisdiction govern proceeding. that find the UCCJEA. defined under 13:1802(7) ( a), & R.S. we that Oklahoma finding that term is La. made, showing subject of jurisdiction of Hinkle, Shannon lack La. UCCJEA), Act ( determination the the of June court's district Uniform Louisiana's Leonard Angelle relator, objection interstate this defendant' s, the the urging Enforcement and Jurisdiction In PART. dispute, granted that jurisdiction. matter JJ. of the portion of the exception declinatory IN DENIED PART; review judgment 2014 13, IN jurisdictional custody Hinkle, PARRO AND WELCH, C.J., GRANTED WRIT Pointe of Parish 45756. No. WHIPPLE, supervisory for Court, District Judicial 18th Coupee, applying Hinkle, Leonard Angelle BEFORE: 2014 JUNE 17, RHP JEW C.J., Whipple, respectfully court erred of state" reasons for reverse of the custody under birth in ten days the 2014 I concur judgment the minor his remand See La. as recognize find was and in that OF APPEAL, FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT the for 131 & the on solely a I the " horne that lived I the there would determination the with best 134. majority modifies that district child accordance arts. part. Accordingly, matter jurisdiction over the divorce proceedings. COURT in the that Oklahoma birth. C.C. the that concluding in the child concurs and Act Oklahoma insofar to I law after and judgment of interest of the child. However, of child his to matter a part part. in dissent as the of nine in dissents district the June court 13, has
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
