Clark C. Cenac, Jr. and Eileen C. Cenac VS Evangeline Business Park, L.L.C., National Building & Contracting Company, Inc. and Ronnie Theriot
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT CLARK C. CENAC, EILEEN C. JR. AND NO. 2014 CW 0818 CENAC VERSUS EVANGELINE LLC AND AND BUSINESS NATIONAL PARK, BUILDING CONTRACTING CO., In Re: Clark INC. and writs, Eileen 32nd Terrebonne, BEFORE: WHIPPLE, WRIT NOT provided have by timely 4-2 Civ. P. failed and and PARRO AND WELCH, not that Rules a and ( return copy of the petition, application. and bound as an index Further, for and 2-18.7, In this was the be of filed this of event it of writ items intent relators intent Courts of comply by application not have does in 4-3 Rule court minutes is Code Rules with contained was Appeal, of La. relators required to writ not application be filed, and to the 4not or a writ hole- punched and/or an Rules 4-9 considered. ( all the it show must July of comply Appeal. 14, 2014, ruling. RHP JEW OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT PUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT file to Courts or before seek contain VGW COURT as application will relators must Louisiana on the all writ thus, notice the pertinent this rehearing documentation timely Rules the and of Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal) Court, including of required by Rule 4-S(B). Supplementation application that of notice Additionally, failed contain a and Parish with the provisions also in the Louisiana order 8), 10), of date Relators and ( supervisory JJ. their of B). 5 (C) ( 1), ( transcript, copy in accordance include for Court, file-stamped, proof Uniform 1914( A) 4-5 (C) ( 11) . The is provide 4-3, art. to C.J., under applying District 154073. CONSIDERED. to filed Rules No. relators failed Cenac, Judicial a new application pertinent original with Any and must documentation, writ Rule new with application 2-12.2, Uniform application contain a must copy of
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
