Heath J. Armbruster VS Melissa Ann Geddings Armbruster
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT HEATH 2014 NO. ARMBRUSTER J. CW 0505 VERSUS MELISSA ANN GEDDINGS JUN 16 201 ARMBRUSTER In Armbruster Melissa Re: 22nd writs, WRIT Rules in Appeal, and that return has Relator application failed Rules does of filing the date setting to and a Courts copy fixed by the copy trial of the of signed a with comply Louisiana contain not date the showing order date St. of JJ. HIGGINBOTHAM, Uniform 4- 5 ( 11) , the intent of notice the 4- 3 4- 2, AND CONSIDERED. NOT supervisory Parish Court, 2007- 10506. McDONALD, GUIDRY, BEFORE: for applying District Judicial No. Tammany, Rushing, of court for filing the application with this Court. 1) , ( C) ( 2) , ( provided does of not the 4) ( 3) , ( in Appeal, of failed has Relator 5) to and ( it that Uniform is Rules of from clear not Rules with comply 6) , 4- 5 ( A) ( B) Louisiana documentation the being challenged. This Court generally consider applications that do not contain documentation which trial ruling court' s Additionally, 5 ( 8) , Uniform this Court ruling. of Louisiana the examine Supplementation failed has relator Rules to is presented with the pleadings Courts trial of court' comply Appeal . In Uniform Rules In this the s Court, seeks Appeal . application must 4- 5 ( A) , Rule See filed be contain a copy of this on to as or ruling. JMM TMH OF APPEAL, PUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT file must be and/ or 4- 9 Rules an and application with documentation, and new a Rules well before JMG COURT 4for of Appeal . pertinent Uniform must comply with Rules 2- 12 . 2, of Courts all contain must order it ruling, application writ Louisiana relator event it of Rule with reviewed by the trial court . this of to application for rehearing will not be considered. 2- 18 . 7, and Courts as June of Louisiana 4- 5 ( C) . 30, 2014, Courts Any and new must
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
