Jane Doe VS 705, Inc., Charles E. Scott, Jr., and Carl E. Duffield, III

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 2014 N0. DOE JANE CW 0463 VERSUS 705, AND JR. , DUFFIELD, E. CARL SCOTT, E. CHARLES INC. , JUN 0 3 1z In Re: 705, d/ b/ Inc. , 23rd writs, PARRO, BEFORE: 2014, 3, February summary plaintiff has is Parish DRAKE, to AND the of of and produce factual is dated court motion Inc. ' s, judgment the JJ. trial 705, defendant, the reversed failed WELCH supervisory Court, judgment The denying judgment District MeCLENDON, GUIDRY, GRI NTED , WRIT applying for Bar, s 105374 . No. Ascension, Bogie ' a Judicial 1J14 for The granted. support sufficient to establish that she will be able to satisfy her evidentiary burden of proof at trial that the defendant breached its duty to refrain patron cause from or and issue genuine 966 { C) { 2) ; allow said damages the of not that was the to an La. Code 4/ ( La. underage and there therefore, See 2000- 1699 alcohol cause- in- fact herein; fact . Zummo, v. serving of asserted material of Berg the breach Civ, 25/ O1) , legal is no P. art . 786 So. 2d 708 . EGD RHP McClendon, Welch, factual as set in J. , support fact forth OF concurs . J. , cause FIRST FOR THE OF of CIRCUIT COURT COORT plaintiff establish petition dissents . C CLER{ to plaintiff' s legal APPEAL, EPUTY The concurs . sufficient in and/ or Guidry, COURT J. , and plaintiff' s that failed to produce defendant' s affidavits damages . was breach a cause

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.