State Of Louisiana VS Charles D. Curry

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF 2013 N0. LOUISIANA KW 2076 VERSUS D. CHARLES In Ep 2 CURRY Re: State Judicial Rouge, BEFORE: HIGGINBOTHAM GRANTED. WRIT personally 2nd 2126 ( La. 11/ 19/ 10) , 2nd an erratic Patterson So. 3d driver, State 391; 264, State 46 Stapa, writ Patterson, in turning who 201045, 775 Officer Thus, Southon jurisdiction, Lieutenant was merely who was to the providing in of charge and test, law and OF APPEAL, DEPUTY FOR dissents and would deny the writ . COURT CLERK THE CIRCUIT CO T his conducting respondent . FIRST of Officer assistance JEK J. , exiting respondent MRT Higginbotham, Lieutenant the limited of stop marked of breath color to a confines interviewing the in respondent the within conducting) under to prior scene in acting but of stop investigation Further, Patterson, investigation the Lieutenant permission respondent the and possibly not was on Police Addis granted, of properly acted (and being over arrived contacted traffic a Amendment . preparing Addis; and effected vehicle, COURT 45, 773 Williams, v. can denied, v. 262 . So. 3d out- of- an protocol, proper See So. 3d 46 8/ 27/ 10) , Cir. manner and vehicle; Fourth driver. the 49 requesting, respondent; his following by created exigency reckless or a Brusly police officer who observed respondent driving Southon, in Cir. the of 8/ 27/ 10) , App. App. Baton West of JJ. THERIOT, erratic of stop La. La. AND officer, police traffic a writs, supervisory Parish Court, Because an observing jurisdiction for applying District 113, 216 . No. KUHN, effect Louisiana, of 18th 2U 1, own to the

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.