Andrew Wetzel VS Amanda Seagraves Wetzel

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 N0. WETZEL ANDREW CW 2164 VERSUS AMANDA SEAGRAVES Re : Andrew In WETZEL Wetzel, Judicial for applying Court, District writs, 22nd Tammany, No. supervisory Parish St . of 2008- 16843 . Wetzel hereby is entitled Motion appended to this Division L, that provided with before WITH GRANTED WRIT April It Writ a 2014 . be Action, ruling issue notice See is of La . FIRST CIRCUTT i , PUTY FOR CLERK THE OF COURT COURT in that a and art . with of No. that Andrew pleading wnich is 2008- 16843, this this 5181 ( B) . of the copy Docket compliance C. C. P. VGW APPEAL, application ORDERED thereon, 7EW OF writ filed WJC COURT JJ. Judgment, From Relief CRAIN, Tre ORDER. granted. £or written 25, WELCH AND C. J. , WHIPPLE, BEFORE: Court order on be or 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY STATE OF LOUISIANA DKT: ANDREW D. WETZEL FILED: VERSUS AMANDA SEAGRAVES WETZEL CLERK OF COURT MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGIIlENT NOW INTO THIS COURT COMES, Andrew D. Wetzel, Pro Se' Petitioner, who seeks relief from this courts judgement in I the above matter, to wit: 1. The court granted the petitionr' s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, saying that he could not afford to pay the filling fees. 2. THe court refused to serve the petitioner's wi£ in the above divorce e matter because he has not pay any fees. 3. The United States Supreme Court ruled in Boddie v. Connecticut 401 U. . S 371, 380- 2, 91 S. t. 780 1971) that " t« courts can not rquire 8 C s te that indigentG who can not pay the filling fees and or fees in a divorce matter pay before the court hears and or grants the divorce.' WHEREFORE, this court should grant relief from the judgement and grant the petitioner's divorce. sI Andrew D. Wetze 670 nell Hili RL i Homer, La 71040 i Y i%', Yv C1erk Of Court, Please find and file the enclosed. Yo An rew Wetzel I

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.