State Of Louisiana VS Shelia Marie Hamilton
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT STATE 2013 N0 LOUISIANA OF KW 1520 VERSUS N 0 V 1 2013 HAMILTON MARIE SHELIA Shelia Marie Hamilton Re applying for supervisory writs 16th In Court Judicial District Parish of St Mary No 177984 2008 PETTIGREW MeDONAI AND McCLENDON D BEFORE WRIT failed to wherein comply this district IN PART Relator PART IN MADE GRANTED with Court postconviction relief ORDER AND represents this found erred court WITH s Court merit in that in DENIED the ON THE district action in 2013 s relator the that ruling JJ claim SHOWING court KW has 0255 that the application for filed in October 2012 was untimely and vacated the ruling dismissing the application for postconviction remanded this matter the for district court relief and Division C to reconsider the application for postconviction We are advised by the office of the Clerk of Court of relief St Mary Parish that s relator If relator s case has A representation been reallotted to correct Division A for of the merits to the ordered consider is application postconviction relief if it has not already done so Division is Relative to the application for postconviction relief filed in May 2013 the writ is denied on the showing made Relator failed to include the application for postconviction relief the transcript of the guilty plea and any other portions of the district court record that might support tne claims raised in the Supplementation of application for postconviction relief this writ application and an application for rehearing wi11 or not be See considered Appeal Rules should include the missing items noted Uniform Any 9 4 7 18 2 entire above Rules contents and a of future copy of of Louisiana Courts of filing on this issue this the application this In the ruling event relator elects to file a new application with this Court the application shall be filed on or before January 14 2014 PMc JTP COURT c OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT r P DEPU CL FOR RK THE OF COORT COURT
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
