State Of Louisiana VS Lavon Markee Bullock
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA CUtiRT OF APPEAL v N FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 KA 0612 STATE OF LOUISIAlYA VERSUS LAVON MARKEE BULLOCK Judgment Rendered November 1 2013 Appealed from the Second Twenty Judicial District Court In and for the Parish of St Tammany State of Louisiana Trial Court Number 520513 Honorable Reginald T Badeaux III Judge Presiding x r Walter P Reed Covington LA Counsel far Appellee State of Louisiana Kathryn Landry Baton Rouge I1A Mary E Roper Baton Rouge LA Counsel for Defendant Appellant Lavon Markee Bullock x BEFORE WHIPPLE CWELCH AND CRAIN JJ J WHIPPLE C J The defendant Lavon M Bullock was charged by Twenty Judicial Second District Court bill of information number 520513 with one count of simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling a violation of LSA 14 and initially S 2 R 62 pled not guilty Pollowing the denial of his rnotiions to suppress filed under a different bill of infot and the filing of a rabitual offender bill against him mation pursuant to a plea agreement defendant pled guilty to numerous charges including the instant offer in his best interests reserving his right to seek se review of the court ruling on the motioxis to suppress See North Carolina v s Alford 400 U 25 37 91 S Ct 160 167 2 L Ed 2d 162 1970 and State v S Crosby 338 So 2d 584 La 1976 On the instant charge he was sentenced as a felony second habixual offender to twenty years at hard labor without benefit of probation or suspension of sentence He now appeals filing a counseled brief with no assignments of error but requesting review far enor under LSA P Cr C art 920 2 FACTS The State and the defense stipulated that A11en Crawford house was s burglarized on February 7 2012 and two subjects a white male and a black male were identified by a neighbor and Crawfoxd nepriew s ately Approxin three weeks later the subjects were located behind another house without permission to be there and acting suspiciously They left after being confronted Thereafter they were seen by Larry Crawford who witnessed them burglarized sic the residence and positively identified with the Pearl River Police Department See 1 State v Bullock 2013 La App lst Cix llunpublished also rendered 0613 13 1 this date L ISSUES PRF SENTED The counseled defense bcief co3 z assignmezats f errcoa and sets forth ixls o t it is filed to confornc with the procedures ou in nders v California 386 ned l S U 738 87 S C 1396 18 L Ed 2d 93 K ar St v 96 La 67 d ate Jvles 2669 97 12 704 So 2d 241 p e s iso State l3 ia573 So 2d ars 528 La App 4th Cir 1R9t1j Benjamin set forth a pr ta carr wiYh i wherein the U re a ply ced er S Supreme Court discuasecl hou appei caiansel should proceed when upon gs conscientious review of a ounsei fo the case holly frivolous ase and Benjamin has repeatedly been ciied wlth ap by the Louisiana Supreme roval Court See Jyles 704 S 2d at 41 Stat v MQUton 35 La 4 653 0981 28i95 So 2d 1176 1177 per cua State v Ao 6C S 2d 653 La 1992 State iarn als 0 v Robinson S90 So 2d 1185 La 1992 n curi r air Defense counsel has set fo and r xocedural k of the t1 y k ry ist case She sets f thai after a i t a Paxaous d rc x scY a iYac eof the ugn azni ation ra record she has found no mi reser can ap and no ruling of Qa L fr s aIe u tc i al the trial court whi arg sup an a ei uY Existing r aabl c rts her dar jurisprudence ox ur a ch w should a ff in the 1aw r d g ich m l cted Accordingly she moves to withdra A copy of defense counsel brief and motion to withdraw vere sent to the s defendanY This court sent the defendant natice of a pra se briefing schedule pursuant to an order issued on Ma 16 2013 However Yne defendant has not filed a pro se brief with this court This court has condu an independent review of the entire record in this ted matter We have foun no reversible e under L a 920 sors P Cr C A rt 2j 3 Furthermore we conclude tYaere ar nv nozx s ssues or trial court rulangs iaioti a whzch arguabi suppork xkais a u iefen coa and 7pea rcfliraJly h znt viction s sentence are affirn De co b tu ti whi has been ed er xi t se a c thdra h held in abeyan Yjng hc disp fhis m A her en sztior er t N CONVICTI D A NCI T SE WITHDRAW G12A1 TEI 4 L1 IlR1V F A l Tll i TO
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
