State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Carroll Thorguson VS Barnett, Inc., Interline Brands, Inc., Watts Plumbing Technologies, ABC Component Parts Manufacturer, and XYZ Seller
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT FARM STATE COMPANY FIRE AND 2013 NO CASUALTY i CW 1745 CARROLL THORGUSON VERSUS BARNETT BRANDS INC INTERLINE INC WATTS PLUMBING TECHNOLOGIES ABC COMPONENT AND MANUFACTURER PARTS XYZ p EC 1 0 2013 SELLER In Re Inc Judicial 16th writs supervisory Parish of St Mary No for applying Technologies Water Watts District Court 122717 I WHIPPLE BEFORE WRIT trial J C WELCH AND CRAIN DENIED s court We deny judgment declinatory exception the purposefully activities availed demonstrate citizens that the unreasonable in light substantial justice Corp ll26 98 this of of us the over traditional notions of Owens failed 99 13 4 731 So 881 2d 195 L 407 2d Ed to would be it fair play and Corninq La its directing Relator 120 S 526 Ct S U 1019 the has by as state v the the relator jurisdiction Ruckstuhl in denied forum through s state well this error which jurisdiction filed by before as exercise of 17 evidence no 2013 of personal subsidiary the at the finding writ June itself of its of activities of lack Based on relator the dated JJ cert Fiberglas denied 528 1999 VGW JEW Crain exception establish such that it the relator purposefully activities conducting denied I 1999 528 would had S U the 1126 98 this by contacts itself La of to s relator failed with the the privilege v 526 the 731 145 2d So 881 district court Code Civ P and afford conduct the limited and to issue remove petition the within a of the opportunity s relator grounds of period of cour COURT OF APPEAL PUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST CIRCUIT OF COURT COURT to contacts the with objection time by designated the forum the for art 932 discovery amendment by of Owens 2d Ed L407 further proceedings in accordance with La respondents to forum Ruckstuhl 99 13 4 Ct S matter the respondents forum 120 1019 remand sustain minimum availed within Corning Fi Corp berglas cert would presented evidence that and dissents J The on state of the district
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
