Sandra Lea Green, Individually and On Behalf of Her Minor Son, Dillon Stelly VS Dr. Paul J. Hubbell, III, M.D., and Southern Pain and Anesthesia Consultants, L.L.C.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT SANDRA LEA GREEN INDIVIDUALLY N0 AND ON OF HER MINOR SON 2013 CW 0048 BEHALF DILLON STELLY VERSUS JANUARY DR PAUL J HUBBELL MD AND SOUTHERN PAIN Dr Paul J LLC III Hubbell Anesthesia LLC and Southern Pain for applying WRIT PARRO GRANTED HUGHES AND WELCH We observe that and emergency supervisory writs 19th Judicial District Parish of East Baton Rouge No 561466 BEFORE 2013 AND ANESTHESIA CONSULTANTS In Re 11 III Court JJ the district court failed to provide for the record its findings of fact conclusions of law and reasons for judgment as required by La C P art F 1425 plaintiffs in connection Motion in with Limine to its ruling Exclude granting the Expert Testimony of Dr Ioppolo Dr Witcher and Dr Forte and to Prohibit Dr Anderson from Testifying on the Standard of Care with to respect the testimony of Dr Ioppolo Additionally the motion was filed less than sixty days prior to trial and the district court ruled on the motion less than thirty days prior to the trial in contravention Therefore the court January s 9 2013 ruling granting the Motion in Limine to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Dr Ioppolo Dr Witcher and Dr of La P art C Forte and to Prohibit Dr Anderson from Testifying on the Standard of Exclude Care the F 1425 is Expert reversed and Testimony of the Dr Motion in Limine Ioppolo Dr o Witcher and Dr Forte and to Prohibit Dr Anderson from Testifying on the January Standard 9 2013 of Care ruling is denied granting in The part district the s court Motion in Limine to Exclude the Medical Review Panel Opinion is also reversed on The Motion grounds that in Limine to it violates Exclude the Opinion is hereby denied JDH JEW RHP COURT OF APPEAL EPUTY CLERK FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT OF COURT COURT La R 40 S 1299 47 Medical Review Panel
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
