Dennis Glass VS Bryan Galley and Maurice L. Tynes (2012CA0767 Rehearing Application)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
T ESfGNATED FOR FUBLPCATION COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA RE Docket Number 2012 0767 CA Dennis Glass Versus Bryan Galley and Maurice L Tynes 22nd Judicial Distrid Court Case 200610371 St Tammany Parish On Application for Rehearing filed on 02 by Bryan Galley 2013 19 Rehearing 2ranted See attached uer curiam N Vanessa hi I I G Pag cCknd W Toni Manning Higgint tham Filed PR 0 5 2093 Christine L Cro Gle NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2012 CA 0767 DENNIS GLASS VERSUS BRYAN GALLEY AND MAURICE L TYNES ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING BEFORE WHIPPLE C McCLENDON AND HIGGINBOTHAM JJ J PER CURIAM The application for rehearing filed by defendant Bryan appellant Galley is granted for the limited purpose of amending the assessment of appellate costs to reflect that all costs of this appeal are assessed equally against both defendants Bryan Galley and Maurice L Tynes appellants In all other respects the application for rehearing is denied OT f DESiGNATED FC F 3LlCATION COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA RE Docket Number 2012 0767 CA Dennis Glass Versus Bryan Galley and Maurice L Tynes 22nd Judicial District Court Case 200610371 St Tammany Parish On Pfor Rehearing filed on D2 by Maurice L Tynes pplication 2013 19 Rehearing granted for the limited purpose of considering the arguments on behalf of Tynes uaY were previouslg pretermitted reheariic de aan tlxe merits nd origihal opinion r affirmed except as separately amended this date to assess costs equal against both y appellants Vanessa G hp cClendo Toni Manning Higginbo Filed Christine L A 0 5 2013 Gv Cro Clerk am NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2012 CA 0767 DENNIS GLASS VERSUS BRYAN GALLEY AND MAURICE L TYNES ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING BEFORE WHIPPLE C McCLENDON AND HIGGINBOTHAM JJ J PER CURIAM The application for rehearing filed by defendant Maurice L appellant Tynes is granted for the limited purpose of receiving and considering the arguments raised by Tynes in his brief in support of this rehearing since his original brief was rejected as non Having thoroughly considered compliant the issues argument and law raised in Tynes application for rehearing we maintain our original decree affirming the trial court judgment by s summary opinion for the reasons assigned by the trial court We also note that the assessment of appellate costs in our original opinion was amended after consideration of a separate application for rehearing filed by defendant Bryan Galley appellant We granted that rehearing separately for the limited purpose of amending our original opinion to assess the costs of appeal equally against both defendant appellants Bryan Galley and Maurice L Tynes In all other respects the application for rehearing is denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
