Curtis E. Dillon VS Burl Cain, Warden and Richard Stalder, Secretary
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2009 CA 0245 CURTIS E DILLON VERSUS BURL CAIN WARDEN RICHARD STALDER SECRETARY Judgment On Appeal SEP 1 1 2009 rendered 19th Judicial District Court Baton Rouge State of Louisiana from the Parish of East Suit Number 495 146 The Honorable Division M 26 Kay Bates Judge Presiding Curtis E Dillon Counsel for Plaintiff Appellant Angola In LA Proper Person L Bruce Dodd Counsel for Defendant Appellee Baton Louisiana Rouge LA Department of Public Safety and Corrections BEFORE DOWNING GAIDRY AND McCLENDON JJ DOWNING J Curtis E Plaintiff appellant Penitentiary appeals Dillon Mr miscalculated his reasons we that sentence the sentence were Dillon however computer does jail no For the so Jail Credit Letters that he was not prejudice following that were used to comply with not La credited with other time spent proof of the times he alleges were spent in jail Mr not credited nor for Smart has a Simple Burglary charge to fifty years in jurisprudence without merit and the district s suit costs Accordingly of this This summary Recommendation indicates that documents and for an Attempted The record also shows the date that Mr Dillon charges and sentenced Mr Dillon s from A voyelles Parish do reflect when Mr Dillon credit letters the record and relevant Dillon State comply with the public records law not physical custody The doing valid record exists for those times he no has offered Degree Murder charge error are is that the alleges reading of Commissioner in the form of both Angola why the documentation elicited from the Avoyelles Parish Sheriffs Office he shown on at State with allegedly inadequate because they do incarcerated since he claims in invalid evidence in on appeal s Mr Dillon also 15 590 96 placed incarcerated affirm the district court judgment calculate his A inmate Department of Safety and Corrections Louisiana and relied The thrust of Mr Dillon R S an judgment that dismissed his suit against the a alleges Dillon appeal the on each count conclude that Mr Dillon court did not abuse its After s a First convicted review of assignments discretion in of dismissing judgment of the district court is affirmed are disposition we prison was was assessed against the plaintiff appellant Curtis E is rendered in accordance with Uniform Rules Courts of Appeal Rule 2 16 2 AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
