Maximillian Hollins VS Glenwood Regional Medical Center, Dr. C. Russell Greer and Dr. Steven R. Crider
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2008 CA 2593 MAXIMILLIAN HOLLINS VERSUS GLENWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER DR C RUSSELL GREER AND DR STEVEN R CRIDER Judgment Rendered Appealed June 12 2009 from the 19th Judicial District Court In and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge Louisiana Case No 555 224 The Honorable S Counsel for Plaintiff Appellant Douglas Busari Maximillian Hollins Tallulah Louisiana Harry Kay Bates Judge Presiding M Moffett IV Counsel for Intervenor Glenwood Monroe Louisiana 1 r Regional Appellee Medical Center Janie Languirand Coles Counsel for Intervenors Baton C Russell Greer M D and Rouge Louisiana Appellees Steven R Crider M D David A Woolridge Jr Carlton Jones III Baton Rouge Louisiana Counsel for Defendant Appellee Compensation Fund Oversight Board and Cheryl Jackson Malpractice Compliance Louisiana Patient s Director BEFORE KUHN GUIDRY AND GAIDRY JJ GAIDRY J SUMMARY DISPOSITION This is appeal an writ of mandamus process plaintiff timely paid fee A 47 1299 was 9 5823 due l at his not 47 1299 58 l medical a a La by January claim was proceed Morris v 1st Cir claim is V summary E 8 this compelling the s 991 So 2d 551 See La R S La affirm the are judgment AFFIRMED 2 plaintiff to accept 07 Jackson V In re Med Review 1st Cir 5 2 08 La R S Plaintiffs medical 9 5628 App 07 489 to the plaintiff review See La and Latiolais 991 So 2d App 5th Cir 1 22 08 983 So 2d 1288 of the trial court in accordance with Rules 2 16 2 A 2 assessed filing 9 5822 and PCF Board 979 So 2d 489 07 1266 R S Compo Fund Oversight Bd of the Uniform Rules of the Louisiana Courts of appeal RS with the review process Jefferson Hosp accordingly opinion La required by See La 976 So 2d 746 writ denied 08 0393 La 6 27 08 We fee benefit of the doubt the 2006 4 Patient prescribed Proceedings ofOuder and Baldini filing invalid and without effect and 112 07 filed The determinative issue is whether writ of mandamus to to The prescription having paid the fee by that date his request for e App of exceptions director claim malpractice a Fund Compensation malpractice compliance providers 1st Cir 5 28 08 App malpractice Panel and its the PCF Board the the latest to mandamus action that denied Giving plaintiff every c fee and A 2468 La 06 2403 a the Louisiana Patient s for review of care malpractice entitled untimely 40 to Plaintiff not of his medical was in further sustained the peremptory by the defendant health 40 judgment directing plaintiff s request judgment a PCF Board Board Oversight of 4 through 5 Appeal All Maximillian Hollins 6 this and costs of
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
