Julie Hodges VS Eagle Refrigeration and Mechanical, L.L.C.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2008 CA 2230 JULIE HODGES VERSUS EAGLE REFRIGERATION Judgment Rendered MECHANICAL L L C May 8 2009 APPEALED FROM THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NUMBER 536 416 DIVISION 8 THE HONORABLE WILSON FIELDS JUDGE Attorney for Plaintiff Appellant Julie Hodges Denise A Vinet Baton Rouge Louisiana Attorneys for Defendant Appellee Eagle Refrigeration Leon A Crist Ronald L Ronzello Kenner Louisiana BEFORE 9 Mechanical L L C PETTIGREW McDONALD HUGHES JJ Wvbh McDONALD J The plaintiff Airline on Highway in air Eagle Refrigeration conditioning Hodges Baton Mechanical Refrigeration and that Julie was unit in the L L C Subway was no not court install or maintain the air there was no suit with prejudice After granted a de water onto novo court memorandum opinion Appeal Rule 2 store asserting an answer motion for summary in dispute conditioning unit judgment an causing generally denying the judgment asserting that because at the the floor Eagle Refrigeration Subway in favor of Store The trial Eagle Refrigeration genuine issue of material fact and dismissed Ms Subway Eagle Refrigeration that leaked store summary a Hodges filed suit against Eagle Ms Hodges Hodges appealed that judgment review of the case we find that the trial the motion for summary judgment in favor of affirm the trial manager at for the installation and maintenance of genuine issue of material fact granted the motion for finding a as a hereafter responsible allegations and thereafter filed did Ms Rouge slip and fall Eagle Refrigeration filed her to there employed was judgment is issued in Costs are 16 1 B assessed court Eagle Refrigeration against Ms Hodges compliance with the Uniform Rules AFFIRMED 2 correctly and we This Courts of STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2008 CA 2230 @ JULIE HODGES VERSUS EAGLE REFRIGERATION HUGHES J I respectfully rendering MECHANICAL L L C dissenting dissent due summary judgment to issues of inappropriate credibility and contested fact
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
